April 19, 2022
The phrase ‘Environmental, Social and Governance issues’ (ESG) is moving from buzzword to mainstream language. Against that backdrop directors and trustees must be mindful of how their respective duties are evolving and how their actions or inactions will be scrutinised.
Whilst there is no single legal definition of ESG, examples of the issues that could fall within ESG include:
Directors will be familiar with the duty imposed upon them under the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 to act in the best interests of a company. Satisfying this duty could include giving adequate consideration to relevant ESG issues to the company.This is evidenced from the recent Supreme Court of England and Wales judgments in Vedanta Resources Plc v Lungowe and Okpabi v Royal Duct Shell plc (which are likely to be persuasive in Jersey), which emphasise that directors of parent companies should be increasingly concerned about their accountability and potential liability for the actions or inactions of their subsidiaries for ESG related issues. Whilst the decisions from these cases arose from environmental damage, the principles discussed may apply to other ESG related issues.Accordingly, to minimise the risks of directors being involved in ESG related litigation they should:
Trustees are required to act with due diligence as would a prudent person to the best of the trustee’s ability and skill. In particular, trustees are obliged to so far as reasonable preserve and enhance the value of the trust property. In addition, a trustee is duty bound to act in the best interests of their beneficiaries.The penalty for failure to adhere to these duties can be personal liability to make up the difference between the return achieved and what the beneficiaries could have reasonably expected. However, for most trusts, their investment horizon is 30 years or longer, which could well insulate a trustee against changes of fashion in financial markets. A trustee should not be liable for investment losses caused to a trust fund as a result of investing for ESG gains provided that:
Trustees exercising the power of investment to maximise ESG gains should:
Our Business Law team at BCR Law work with local businesses across all sectors, advising on any number of contentious and non-contentious issues from reviewing and updating your terms and conditions and policies and procedures, to guiding business owners and managers through the various legal and regulatory issues that come up when running a business.This article does not constitute legal advice. For advice or further information, please contact us.
The phrase ‘Environmental, Social and Governance issues’ (ESG) is moving from buzzword to mainstream language. Against that backdrop directors and trustees must be mindful of how their respective duties are evolving and how their actions or inactions will be scrutinised.
Whilst there is no single legal definition of ESG, examples of the issues that could fall within ESG include:
Directors will be familiar with the duty imposed upon them under the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 to act in the best interests of a company. Satisfying this duty could include giving adequate consideration to relevant ESG issues to the company.This is evidenced from the recent Supreme Court of England and Wales judgments in Vedanta Resources Plc v Lungowe and Okpabi v Royal Duct Shell plc (which are likely to be persuasive in Jersey), which emphasise that directors of parent companies should be increasingly concerned about their accountability and potential liability for the actions or inactions of their subsidiaries for ESG related issues. Whilst the decisions from these cases arose from environmental damage, the principles discussed may apply to other ESG related issues.Accordingly, to minimise the risks of directors being involved in ESG related litigation they should:
Trustees are required to act with due diligence as would a prudent person to the best of the trustee’s ability and skill. In particular, trustees are obliged to so far as reasonable preserve and enhance the value of the trust property. In addition, a trustee is duty bound to act in the best interests of their beneficiaries.The penalty for failure to adhere to these duties can be personal liability to make up the difference between the return achieved and what the beneficiaries could have reasonably expected. However, for most trusts, their investment horizon is 30 years or longer, which could well insulate a trustee against changes of fashion in financial markets. A trustee should not be liable for investment losses caused to a trust fund as a result of investing for ESG gains provided that:
Trustees exercising the power of investment to maximise ESG gains should:
Our Business Law team at BCR Law work with local businesses across all sectors, advising on any number of contentious and non-contentious issues from reviewing and updating your terms and conditions and policies and procedures, to guiding business owners and managers through the various legal and regulatory issues that come up when running a business.This article does not constitute legal advice. For advice or further information, please contact us.
The phrase ‘Environmental, Social and Governance issues’ (ESG) is moving from buzzword to mainstream language. Against that backdrop directors and trustees must be mindful of how their respective duties are evolving and how their actions or inactions will be scrutinised.
Whilst there is no single legal definition of ESG, examples of the issues that could fall within ESG include:
Directors will be familiar with the duty imposed upon them under the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 to act in the best interests of a company. Satisfying this duty could include giving adequate consideration to relevant ESG issues to the company.This is evidenced from the recent Supreme Court of England and Wales judgments in Vedanta Resources Plc v Lungowe and Okpabi v Royal Duct Shell plc (which are likely to be persuasive in Jersey), which emphasise that directors of parent companies should be increasingly concerned about their accountability and potential liability for the actions or inactions of their subsidiaries for ESG related issues. Whilst the decisions from these cases arose from environmental damage, the principles discussed may apply to other ESG related issues.Accordingly, to minimise the risks of directors being involved in ESG related litigation they should:
Trustees are required to act with due diligence as would a prudent person to the best of the trustee’s ability and skill. In particular, trustees are obliged to so far as reasonable preserve and enhance the value of the trust property. In addition, a trustee is duty bound to act in the best interests of their beneficiaries.The penalty for failure to adhere to these duties can be personal liability to make up the difference between the return achieved and what the beneficiaries could have reasonably expected. However, for most trusts, their investment horizon is 30 years or longer, which could well insulate a trustee against changes of fashion in financial markets. A trustee should not be liable for investment losses caused to a trust fund as a result of investing for ESG gains provided that:
Trustees exercising the power of investment to maximise ESG gains should:
Our Business Law team at BCR Law work with local businesses across all sectors, advising on any number of contentious and non-contentious issues from reviewing and updating your terms and conditions and policies and procedures, to guiding business owners and managers through the various legal and regulatory issues that come up when running a business.This article does not constitute legal advice. For advice or further information, please contact us.
The phrase ‘Environmental, Social and Governance issues’ (ESG) is moving from buzzword to mainstream language. Against that backdrop directors and trustees must be mindful of how their respective duties are evolving and how their actions or inactions will be scrutinised.
Whilst there is no single legal definition of ESG, examples of the issues that could fall within ESG include:
Directors will be familiar with the duty imposed upon them under the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 to act in the best interests of a company. Satisfying this duty could include giving adequate consideration to relevant ESG issues to the company.This is evidenced from the recent Supreme Court of England and Wales judgments in Vedanta Resources Plc v Lungowe and Okpabi v Royal Duct Shell plc (which are likely to be persuasive in Jersey), which emphasise that directors of parent companies should be increasingly concerned about their accountability and potential liability for the actions or inactions of their subsidiaries for ESG related issues. Whilst the decisions from these cases arose from environmental damage, the principles discussed may apply to other ESG related issues.Accordingly, to minimise the risks of directors being involved in ESG related litigation they should:
Trustees are required to act with due diligence as would a prudent person to the best of the trustee’s ability and skill. In particular, trustees are obliged to so far as reasonable preserve and enhance the value of the trust property. In addition, a trustee is duty bound to act in the best interests of their beneficiaries.The penalty for failure to adhere to these duties can be personal liability to make up the difference between the return achieved and what the beneficiaries could have reasonably expected. However, for most trusts, their investment horizon is 30 years or longer, which could well insulate a trustee against changes of fashion in financial markets. A trustee should not be liable for investment losses caused to a trust fund as a result of investing for ESG gains provided that:
Trustees exercising the power of investment to maximise ESG gains should:
Our Business Law team at BCR Law work with local businesses across all sectors, advising on any number of contentious and non-contentious issues from reviewing and updating your terms and conditions and policies and procedures, to guiding business owners and managers through the various legal and regulatory issues that come up when running a business.This article does not constitute legal advice. For advice or further information, please contact us.